By BAR Editor & Senior Columnist Margaret Kimberley
The Obamas' visit to South Africa, for people of color on both sides
of the Atlantic, is heavy on symbolism and photo-ops, but devoid of any
substance for those who hunger and thirst for justice. The ANC won the
flag at the end of apartheid, but South Africa's white elite kept the
land and the money, after allowing a few well-connected black faces into
“...Mandela was freed because of armed struggle and not out of benevolence....”
Centuries of oppression have made black people particularly
susceptible to the tempting siren song which comes with the image of
black success. It is harmless to want a black person to win some coveted
acclaim like a Pulitzer prize or even an Oscar, but quite another to be
rendered stupid by the sight. Our history teaches us that we must be
wary lest we be carried away by emotion that is without substance.
Barack Obama is the most obvious example of this phenomenon and its
pernicious influence. A black man being elected as president of the
United States was long hoped for but seemingly impossible. The
realization of what had long been imagined and the often racist attacks
against this dream create common cause with Obama and intense personal
happiness on his behalf. Yet what seems inspirational is in fact
anything but. The feelings of affection for Obama have been a negative
force which impede rational thought and political common sense. The
people who most epitomized the American search for true democracy have
given it up completely because they love seeing a black man wearing a
POTUS jacket and get angry when white people don’t like seeing it.
That history of struggle and the group identity it creates have not
been limited to the American experience. The decades long fight against
the racist apartheid system in South Africa was supported by millions of
people in this country too. Jim Crow was America’s own apartheid. It is
only logical that the sight of black people being treated cruelly in
the name of white supremacy would elicit feelings of affinity in this
country and around the world.
Nelson Mandela’s release from 27 years of imprisonment and his
subsequent election as president created a surge of pride and joy among
black people everywhere. Unfortunately we did not truly understand what
we were witnessing. These events came about as a result of forces
unacknowledged in America and they also came with a very high price.
The name of the Angolan town Cuito Cuanavale
means little to all but a handful of Americans but it lies at the heart
of the story of apartheid’s end. At Cuito Cuanavale in 1988 Cuban
troops defeated the South African army and in so doing sealed
It is important to know how apartheid ended, lest useless stories
about a miraculously changed system and a peaceful grandfatherly figure
confuse us and warp our consciousness. Mandela was freed because of
armed struggle and not out of benevolence. He was also freed because the
African National Congress miscalculated and made concessions which have
since resulted in terrible poverty and powerlessness for black people
in South Africa. By their own admission, some of his comrades
concede that they were unprepared for the determination of the white
majority to hold the purse strings even as they gave up political power.
Now the masses of black South Africans are as poor as they were during the time of political terror. The Sharpeville massacre
of 1960 which galvanized the world against South Africa was repeated in
2012 when 34 striking miners were killed by police at Marikana. The Marikana massacre made a mockery of the hope which millions of people had for the ANC and its political success.
Obama’s recent visit to South Africa when the 94 year old Mandela was
hospitalized created a golden opportunity for analysis and a
questioning of long held assumptions about both men but the irrefutable
fact is this. The personal triumphs of these two individuals have not
translated into success for black people in either of their countries.
“ It isn’t true that black people benefit from the political success of certain individuals..”
The victory of international finance capital wreaks havoc on both
sides of the Atlantic ocean. In the U.S. black people have reached their
political and economic low point during the Obama years. The gains won
50 years ago have been reversed while unemployment, mass incarceration,
and Obama supported austerity measures have all conspired to undo the
progress which was so dearly paid for.
Obama’s visit to Africa as Mandela lay critically ill brought very
sincere but very deeply misled people to remember all of the wrong
things. It isn’t true that black people benefit from the political
success of certain individuals. It isn’t true that role models undo
systemic cruelty or that racism ends because of their presence or that
white people see or treat the masses of black people any differently
when one black person reaches a high office.
The maudlin sentiment was all built on lies. Mandela fought the good
fight for many years and is worthy of respect for that reason alone. But
his passing should be a moment to reflect on his mistakes and on how
they can be avoided by people struggling to break free from injustice.
Obama’s career is a story of ambition and high cynicism which met
opportunity. There is little to learn from his story except how to spot
the next evil doer following in his footsteps.
It is high time that myths were called what they are. They are
stories which may help explain our feelings but they are stories
nonetheless and they do us no good.
Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR,
and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated
blog as well as athttp://freedomrider.blogspot.com. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgendaReport.com.